Our client came to us concerned that his previous attorney had mishandled the case. He faced three criminal counts and two added firearm allegations after an incident in which he said he fired a gun into the air because he felt threatened by a drunk neighbor. We reviewed the case, addressed the charges he faced, and worked to secure a resolution. Both felony assault counts and the firearm allegations were dismissed. He entered a no contest plea to one felony count of negligent firearm discharge and received probation, with no additional jail time.

Our client faced a shoplifting charge while dealing with a health condition and the effects of a substance that affected her judgment. We advocated for an opportunity to address the circumstances behind the incident. She entered a diversion program, and the charge was later dismissed.

Our client was an employee who faced a charge under California Penal Code § 647(b). Our client maintained that they had no knowledge of the alleged activity. We advocated for our client based on their role in the case, and the charge was ultimately dismissed.

Our client faced charges in connection with an alleged $1.5 million fraud scheme. The case involved multiple individuals and electronic communications, making it important to examine what our client knew and what role they actually played. Our defense team filed a motion seeking phone records, messages, and other electronic evidence to investigate those questions and advocate for our client. Ultimately, our client avoided jail time.

An individual was arrested for an alleged violation of California Penal Code section 422, criminal threats. The attorneys at Perliss Law Firm became involved early, before any charges were filed, and presented the matter to the District Attorney's Office. After review, the District Attorney declined to file the charge, and no criminal case was ever brought. Outcomes like this are a reminder that a case is not decided by an arrest — and that early, experienced intervention may change the course of a case before it ever reaches a courtroom.

After years of litigation, strategy, and relentless defense, we were able to get our client's 20 million dollar extortion case dismissed. Today, justice prevailed.

Our client was charged with domestic battery under Penal Code 243(e)(1) after an argument escalated and resulted in minor scratches. The incident arose during an emotional dispute, and law enforcement was contacted without full awareness of the legal consequences that would follow. After the incident, the alleged victim made clear that they did not wish to pursue charges. We carefully reviewed the facts, addressed the context of the situation, and communicated directly with the prosecution to present the complete picture. As a result of our advocacy, the case was dismissed. Our client avoided a conviction and protected their record.

Pasadena Court House

Our client was investigated for child endangerment under Penal Code 273a after a minor verbal argument between husband and wife led a neighbor to call the police. No physical violence occurred, and the situation was limited to a brief domestic dispute. We immediately communicated with the District Attorney and clarified the facts, demonstrating that the allegations did not meet the legal standard for child endangerment. The District Attorney rejected the case. No charges were filed, and our client avoided a criminal record.

Pomona Court House